What if IBM will buy Sun for real?

When Wall Street Journal writes, they have their reasons. A couple of days ago they wrote that IBM wants to buy Sun Microsystems for $6.5B.

To me, this is sad news. I like Sun and don “t want them to die. Neither do I want to see thousands of Sun “s employees being laid off. But if IBM will really purchase Sun such consequences are unavoidable.

But if laid off people will be re-hired by other employers, some Sun “s software will die. I mean will cease to exist.

IBM is a huge firm. It makes hardware, software and has an extensive consulting arm. While IBM has been always supporting Java and its derivatives like IDE and J2EE servers, they were always behind. Just look at the delays in implementing latest Java specs in WebSphere. RAD IDE is not as good as Eclipse either.

So what software will die first?

IMO, Glassfish won “t survive. For years, Sun has been pushing this server that certainly has some modest following, but I doubt that IBM will need this product. They have WebSphere.

NetBeans will bite the bullet too. Again, this IDE has small number of developers who use it (mostly outside of the US), but Netbeans enjoyed an enormous amount of marketing dollars from Sun. Without such food supplements NetBeans would have really tough times staying competitive. Besides, IBM does not need it to compete neither with RAD IDE nor with Eclipse.

OK, it “s sad that these two products will go, but what worries me the most is the fate of JavaFX, which is not even a toddler yet. IBM may throw this baby with the bath water, and I don “t want this to happen. Even though JavaFX 1.1 is not competitive with its rival Flex and Silverlight just yet, it “s a very potent technology that in a year or two could become an equal player in the RIA space. But today, it needs bret feeding and it gets it. Continuing leadership of Sun plus outsourcing of JavaFX could bring good results. But I doubt that IBM would be as interested as Sun in success of JavaFX.

Even though JavaFX is not ready yet for enterprise application development, let “s not forget that Java Kernel project saw the light mainly to make JavaFX competitive. It “s because of JavaFX, the Java “s browser “s plugin doesn “t depend on the browser any longer. Remember that 10 year old law suite between Sun and Microsoft over the fact that Microsoft quietly added some libraries to Java making it dependent on the platform?

Back than, Sun won that battle but lost the war. Sun lost the runtime for Java applets available back then on more than 90% of computers since Internet Explorer was literally the only game in town. Even now, IE holds 75% of the market hellip; and is shipped with ten year old Java 1.1 plugin.

Now, we see the light again ndash; JRE won “t depend on the browser any longer. IMO, JavaFX was the main pusher for this.

But if IBM will swallow Sun, it “s not clear why would they want to overly invest in this language. Sun wasn “t too successful with monetizing of their software, but we as a community, were enjoying working with their products. Oh, well hellip;

We shouldn “t forget about yet another piece of software that Sun “s leaders purchased for $1B. Yes, the chances are they made this decision while being under the influence hellip;As of now, creators of MySQL left Sun.

Anyway, there are 10 million users of MySQL Server. Sun is thinking of using these legions for smart marketing that will allow selling them other goodies. Sun CEO blogged that even if one percent of MySQL users would decide to purchase others Sun “s products hellip;

IBM certainly needs 10M users. But do they need competition for UDB? I don “t know. Can they quietly kill MySQL? I don “t know.

Am I painting things pitch black for no reason? Do you see any positive developments for the Java community resulting from this $6.5B deal?

I see only one – JAVA stockholders will get a better price for their stock .


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s